Choosing a managerial style of your own ...
There are two ways to understand the managerial style in management and which are more frequently used:
The scale of both the styles is at extreme ends if the autocratic is at one end then diplomatic is at other ends, both are in different directions due to the nature of management issues and work style. The autocratic style is the old way of handling the situation. In this case, the manager is the leader and issues orders to the employees below them – to act and follow accordingly. A clear image is portrayed to the team members that the manager leads the show – the boss, and they need to follow as per his will. The team coordination and belief in the result are missing due to the harshness and severity of decision-making. The crucial decisions taken by an autocrat are without a consensus of the team working under him. The manager considers team members working for them rather than with them. They are also under the impression that if they take the opinion from their team, they may appear weak in decision-making, not understand the potential issues, and lose credibility before the team. The team members are seen as inferiors, and the autocrat deems interaction with them as inappropriate. The autocrat makes specific policies and sets explicit rules for others to follow without bothering what others think.
On the contrary, the diplomat mostly takes decisions based on the circumstances. And always have a sound reason behind what they are doing. They also explain the situation to the team members regarding the conditions and follow-up on the outcome to act accordingly. By doing this, the team members get the confidence and importance of the decision on what they will perform. Whenever possible, the diplomats discuss and try to reach a consensus with the team members they believe are working with them on the said project with complete support.
The autocratic style manager always fears that the team may not live up to the mark according to the situation. He needs to continuously check and put in the effort to make things happen according to the set expectations. On the other hand, diplomats have a window of adequate support and respect from their teams. The autocratic manager remains in fear and feels the situation's pressure while his team works as puppets. Considering this, the diplomat finds the autocrat to be a tyrant while the autocrat thinks that the diplomat is kind and tender-hearted.
It's Not All Black and White
While studying both the management styles reflects that both are equally important in management in different situations. A good manager's success heavily depends on how they understand the problem and can achieve equilibrium. Autocrat and the diplomat are two distinct tones in management. Within the first few days, one of the first actions to be taken is to evaluate the ability and need to adopt both styles, whichever suits the condition. In this process, keep in mind that management is flexible and situational while taking the decision. Due to changes in the situation, the same conclusion may click in one scenario and may not work in another case. So, we also need to understand that the diplomatic style may perform effectively; however, no single management style is ultimate and appropriate according to the situation's requirements.
For example, in an autocratic management style, as a manager leading the finance department in the organization, it will be more appropriate for you to prepare the budget of the event comfortably and place all the suitable figures at the right place without any problem. The outcome will be different rather than when you involve your team in this situation. As the manager, you will be more efficient at handling the matter without any consultation with the team. On the other hand, if the manager allows the team to discuss for opinion purposes, then the personal experience and arguments shall never rest. The discussion will end up only with the wastage of time. However, the team members can be asked to give their opinion on the location for an event, for example, and you will get a good result as diplomatic manager. In another case, where the diplomatic management style may be in handy is when the consultation process begins before any significant project. At the very start, you should be more prudent than usual cases. You need to take all your team members on board and provide an opening for consensus on most ideas on merit. This is a vital ingredient for the successful execution of any project; otherwise, you may not receive the desired result without close engagement with the team members.
When choosing a management style at any point in time, the following needs to be considered:
Your personality characteristics and management qualities.
The volume of work to be completed and how quickly it needs to be done.
The culture of the organization and the industry it falls into.
Abilities of your team members and the goals of your organization.
The personalities of your team members.
Awareness is Essential
Awareness regarding the circumstance is the key when selecting the management style in any situation. For one, personal self-awareness will help you understand how to utilize your strengths and weaknesses. This is necessary to help adopt an approach that maximizes the efforts, strengths, and prudent arguments to support the idea. Secondly, awareness regarding the team members' status will help better understand what style will work best when dealing with them. This will provide a clear understanding of where assistance or constant support is required for smooth sailing. Some team members might perform well with little guidance to carry out the task. However, some will require continuous engagement to reach the target point. As a leader and manager, you are responsible for coughing up all the details relating to the project to determine which style to adopt and proactively take the decision if any change is needed at any time.
Since the management is situational, therefore, baseline management style could also be applied. A baseline management style's importance is to help give the team members a general direction to carry out the work. With a baseline management style, the team would easily understand what is expected of them. If your approach is autocratic, the team will probably avoid wasting time developing opinions and ideas. Communication among the team members also plays a vital role in giving confidence. You might get into trouble if you fail to communicate your team's management style through actions and plans.
Furthermore, both the styles have their reasons due to situational requirements; however, the baseline management style ideally is far away from the autocratic style. The quality managers realize the situation well and set the pace, keeping in mind the team's ability, performance, and quality of work with defined timelines. Professionally, the manager handles and tries to take everyone on board through a diplomatic management approach. The best managers discuss the pros and cons, the difficulties, different options, and ideas to achieve the target. This can only happen if the manager remains close to the diplomatic style, stay in touch with the team members, give respect as per the abilities, and handle the situation professionally. New ideas based on merit shall provide room for the members to play freely within the plan to achieve the target.